Sailiently in one minute
Sailiently answers one question — does AI recommend you? — and then helps you change the answer. The AI Visibility Tracker measures your buyers’ real questions across six engines and tells you where you are cited, mentioned, absent, or where nobody owns the answer yet. Citation Radar shows the open web those answers are drawn from. The GEO Optimization tools then audit the competitor pages that won, and draft the page that beats them. Re-run and see what moved.
What sets it apart against the rest of the category: it is pay-per-use — $1 = 1 credit, no subscription, a quiet month costs nothing — and it ends in a fix, not a dashboard. Every score is reproducible: paste any URL, including a rival’s, and check it yourself.
What you get without a monthly bill
- A free Site Check, every time, with no card and no trial clock.
- 5 credits to audit a page across all six engines, with the evidence behind every factor.
- A quiet month costs nothing. There is no plan underneath the credits to keep paying for.
- The job ends in a fix — an impact-ranked list and a draft grounded in your own content.
What the category charges
| What the category charges | Source |
|---|---|
| A benchmark of more than 30 AI search monitoring tools put the category's average price at about $337 per month. | Rankability, Jun 2026 |
| Published entry prices run from roughly $20–29/mo to $295–399/mo, with enterprise custom-quoted into the thousands. Serious multi-engine tracking generally starts near $200–500/mo. | Acromatico, 14 Jul 2026 |
Figures are reported from dated public sources, not from our own testing of each vendor’s checkout. Verify current pricing with the vendor before you buy — packaging in this category changes often.
The arithmetic of a quiet month
Take a realistic year. You take on AI-visibility work for six clients, spread unevenly — three in one quarter, none in another. A subscription bills all twelve months. Pay-per-use bills six jobs.
| Over twelve months | Subscription at category average | Pay-per-use |
|---|---|---|
| Six client site passes | ~$4,044 (12 × $337) | ~$510 (6 × $85) |
| Two quiet months | billed | $0 |
| One page you want to check | billed | $5 |
The $337 figure is the category average from a 2026 survey of more than 30 AI search monitoring tools, not a specific competitor’s price. Cheaper subscriptions exist — the point is the shape of the bill, not the size of it. If your work is continuous rather than project-based, the arithmetic reverses and you should buy the subscription.
When a subscription is genuinely the better buy
Honestly, sometimes it is. Buy the subscription if:
- You track the same prompts every day and want alerting when something moves. Continuous monitoring is exactly what a subscription is for and we do not pretend to replace it.
- Your client needs a dashboard they log into on their own schedule.
- Your volume is steady and high — at our rates, roughly six or more full site passes a month is the point where a flat fee starts to win.
Frequently asked questions
Is there really no monthly fee?
No monthly fee. $1 = 1 credit, and you buy credits in bundles. A quiet month costs nothing.
What does a typical job cost?
A Site Check is free. A URL audit is 5 credits, a gap analysis 5, a page rewrite 10. A seven-page site pass is 7 × 12 = 84 credits ($84 at list), so the 100-credit bundle at $85 covers it with credits to spare.
How does that compare to the category?
A 2026 benchmark of more than 30 AI search monitoring tools put the average at about $337 per month, and a July 2026 round-up found serious multi-engine tracking generally starting near $200-500 per month. Those are reported figures; verify with each vendor.
Which engines are included?
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode — all six, with no add-on tiers.
When should I buy a subscription instead?
When you need continuous daily monitoring, client-facing dashboards, or your volume is high enough that a flat fee beats per-job pricing. We would rather say that plainly than sell you the wrong shape of tool.